The Trowel Award is the highest honor of the Cotsen
Institute of Archaeology.
Recipients:
| Lloyd E.Cotsen | December 15, 1992 |
| Franklin D. Murphy | December 15, 1992 |
| Timothy K. Earle | June 13, 1994 |
| Friends of Archaeology | March 28, 1998 |
| Richard M. Leventhal | June 8, 2001 |
| Giorgio Buccellati | May 3, 2002 |
| Merrick Posnansky | May 3, 2002 |
| James Sackett | May 27, 2004 |
|
Giorgio Buccellati (founding Director of the Cotsen Institute of Archaeology 1973-1983) presents the Trowel to James Sackett in honor of his contributions as a scholar, Director of the Cotsen Institute (1983-1984), and continuing Chair of the Executive Committee. Prof. Buccellati's speech honoring James Sackett follows. |
The best way to be brief is to imitate the most illustrious short speech
of history – si licet parva componere magnis…
Here we go – as Jim would say…
_________
One score and seventeen years ago is when my friendship with Jim began.
Young assistant professors, we were both adjusting to the UCLA institutional
scene, at the same time that we were seeking our place in the realm
of thought.
Let me propose this to you as a first beautiful aspect of Jim’s
personality: how to blend the institutional and the intellectual in
a harmonious whole, rather than insisting on a disconnect that can easily
lead to either administrative boredom or scholarly sterility.
And here is a second: how to blend experience and analysis – or,
if you will (in more technical terms) the humanistic and the scientific.
That was, for me as I think it must be for all, a stimulus and a comfort
– a stimulus to go beyond established frames and the comfort that
we are still carried by tradition.
It is to celebrate Jim’s inimitable presence on the stage of UCLA
archaeology that we want him to have, today, the symbol of our profession.
And so, we have come to dedicate a portion of our toolkit, the humble,
the noble trowel, with Jim’s name.
It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. It celebrates
Jim for what he is and for what he has brought to us.
But in a larger sense, we want to take to heart his teaching; we want
to appropriate the values he has shown us over the years and shows us
today with ever renewed freshness; we want to go to the heart of the
matter rather than gawk at the mirage of fashion.
And so it is that, in the wake of his accomplishments, we resolve that
archaeology as both an art and a science shall not perish from the earth.
|